Congresswoman Matsui Votes Against Legislation That Would Weaken Consumer Financial Protection BureauFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: MARA LEE Congresswoman Matsui Votes Against Legislation That Would Weaken Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Today, Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D-CA) voted against H.R. 1315, the so-called Consumer Financial Protection Safety and Soundness Improvement Act of 2011 legislation which would, in fact, undermine consumer protection by weakening the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. On today’s one year anniversary of Dodd-Frank, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, one of the key provisions of the enacted law, is granted its regulatory authority, which will further authority and will start to protect consumers from abuses by financial institutions. Yet today the House spent its time debating a bill to weaken the provisions granting the Bureau its authority, demonstrating the commitment of House Republicans to undermine the very law that is meant to help Americans who were hurt by the lack of appropriate regulatory oversight which led to the economic collapse of 2008. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is an essential piece of Wall Street reform, and will seek to stop the types of financial abuses which led to the greatest financial crisis of our time and caused so many Americans to lose their jobs, homes, life savings, said Congresswoman Matsui. Many of the protections in the Dodd-Frank Act are already being implemented; but before the bill is even full implemented, House Republicans are showing their allegiance to big banks and their disinterest in consumer protection by attempting to weaken and undermine the agency. Such measures as the one brought forth today would only increase the chance of another financial crisis occurring in the future, and unfortunately, it would put consumers once again put in harm’s way. As Republicans try to frame this legislation as greater oversight of the work of the CFPB, in truth, the CFPB already has a high level of oversight, accountability, and transparency required of it. For instance, it must report its activities twice a year to Congress, annually justify its budget, carefully assess the impact of its actions on small banks and businesses, and consult with other federal regulators on proposed regulations. In contrast, H.R. 1315 would reverse the existing protections, and instead allow the same bank regulators who failed before to protect consumers and stop the financial crisis the power to block the rules put in place by the CFPB. It would delay the protections that the CFPB does put in place. In short, H.R. 1315 would severely hamper the CFPB’s ability to regulate financial institutions. If the financial crisis proved anything, it is that we need more oversight of financial institutions and stronger consumer protections; now is not the time to limit the role of an agency whose mission is to do just that. But now is the time to side with consumers and American families over the big banks that put us in the mess, stated Matsui. Since being created by law last year, the CFPB has already made progress for consumers in the following areas:
For more information about the Wall Street Reform Act, click here. # # # |
